4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing) 🏁
Forum

Forum



SearchSearch   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 31.08.2025 - 22:41:28
Pages:  1  

4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)

Advertising


AuthorMessage

M3C

users




Statistics:
Messages: 3,859
Registration: 01.29.2003

Hmm looks a lot like this bug... Keys

---------------------------------------
Message # 1 29.05.23 - 06:19:24
RE: 4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)

97Msedan

users




Statistics:
Messages: 80
Registration: 01.10.2003

Reastream still does not send audio to localhost 127.0.0.1 after all this time. still not fixed. It worked fine in windows XP. It will not work in Windows 7 or 8 to localhost 127.0.0.1

---------------------------------------
Thomas / 97 M3 Sedan SOLD!
Message # 2 29.05.23 - 06:29:08
RE: 4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)

Diver

users




Statistics:
Messages: 219
Registration: 09.27.2002

Does it also happen with Preferences -> Audio -> Buffering: "Anticipative FX processing..." disabled? Maybe also related: - Cumulative note preview lag when MIDI track is sent to another track that has any FX inserted (anticipative FX processing buffers cumulate?):

---------------------------------------
Diver 2000 740iL
Message # 3 29.05.23 - 06:36:03
RE: 4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)

vdigiovanni

users




Statistics:
Messages: 480
Registration: 11.03.2003

@gofer, yes sounds exactly like your issue. Will test on my rig when get back tonight. Keys.

---------------------------------------
Message # 4 29.05.23 - 06:47:00
RE: 4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)

ArcticSilverM3

users




Statistics:
Messages: 398
Registration: 09.29.2002

Anticipative FX Processing 

---------------------------------------
Message # 5 29.05.23 - 06:56:00
RE: 4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)

Gary-TulZa

users




Statistics:
Messages: 3,091
Registration: 07.12.2002

Yes, confirmed, the song position presented in Jamstix is ahead of the Reaper play position by the amount set in the 'Anticipative Fx Processing Render Ahead' preferences value. Surely this is wrong - or do we just lower/disable it for Jamstix too? I don't know how to change the title of the thread to indicate its related to Render Value so that the devs see it?

---------------------------------------
Sig courtesy of ///Maniac '99 Z3 2.3 '97 740iL '90 735iL '65 Sunbeam Alpine - Pimpmobile
Message # 6 29.05.23 - 07:02:25
RE: 4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)

djkiko

users




Statistics:
Messages: 512
Registration: 02.13.2003

I think the devs are aware already that there are problems. In Justin says that the anticipative FX processing change (introduced in 4.32pre3) won't be in 4.32 release version because it's not ready for prime time. Anyway, I'm going to try and add some hint in the thread title to be on the save end :)

---------------------------------------
Message # 7 29.05.23 - 07:09:01
RE: 4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)

96cosmosM3

users




Statistics:
Messages: 3,644
Registration: 06.10.2002

Thanks Gofer, good job.

---------------------------------------
Message # 8 29.05.23 - 07:16:30
RE: 4.32pre8 and 8b Song Position Bug?? (related to Anticipative FX processing)
Odd flanging sound when recording : Previous topicNext topic: Higher bitrate
Pages:  1  

Message
Name
Message

Click on the dot next to the name to address the participant

           
   
The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants

Powered by platform: bbPress 2.19